Latest
Hiring has become outdated. Resumes dominate the process, but they tell you surprisingly little about what a person can actually do. Despite having been in use for hundreds of years, resumes have few formal standards. For example: one resume may list work history chronologically while another may list them according to relevance, or one resume may have a dedicated section to list the tools an applicant is proficient with while another may mention the tools they utilized for each job.
Because the process is dominated by the resume employers rely on credentials—degrees, job titles, company names—to make decisions, often missing out on qualified talent in the process. As the pressure grows to find the right people faster and build more equitable teams, more organizations are looking for a better way. One approach is gaining traction: skills-based hiring.
What is skills-based hiring?
Skills-based hiring is a recruitment approach that prioritizes a candidate’s actual abilities and skill sets as opposed to the type of biographical details found in a resume. Instead of asking “where have they worked?” or “what’s on their resume?”, hiring teams ask “can this person do the job?”
This shift reflects a growing understanding that traditional hiring methods often filter out qualified candidates for the wrong reasons—especially when resumes and networks are used as proxies for skill. It also eliminates one layer of subjectivity from the applicant screening process; instead of having to parse qualifications across a wide array of resume formats and style choices, hiring teams can have a standardized format to gauge applicants against one another.
Why skills-based hiring matters
The resume is outdated. As a standard it’s existed in one manner or another for hundreds of years, but it's failed to evolve for the data age. It provides a list of past experiences but little clarity on current capability. A resume may tell you someone worked at a Fortune 500 company—but not whether they were any good at it. It may include prestigious schools—but not whether the candidate can solve the problems your team faces today.
This type of screening reinforces systemic inequities and narrows your talent pool. According to research from Harvard Business School, millions of “hidden workers” are filtered out of consideration each year due to rigid requirements around education or work history. Yet many of these candidates have the right skills, they just don’t fit the traditional mold.
How skills-based hiring works
Skills-based hiring uses structured methods to evaluate candidates based on what they can do—or have the potential to do. Common tactics include:
Skills assessments – Short tests, simulations, or challenges that mirror real job tasks.
Structured interviews – Consistent questions tied to core competencies, not background.
Work sample projects – Paid or unpaid take-home tasks that demonstrate applied skills.
Job descriptions focused on outcomes – Instead of listing qualifications, the job post focuses on what success looks like in the role.
The goal is to create an objective, fairer way to evaluate talent and to find people who can thrive in the role, regardless of pedigree.
Benefits of skills-based hiring
This approach helps organizations:
Broaden access – It opens doors to candidates without traditional credentials, including veterans, career changers, bootcamp grads, and people from historically marginalized backgrounds.
Improve quality of hire – By focusing on ability, companies reduce the risk of hiring someone based on brand-name experience that doesn’t translate to results.
Advance DEIB goals – Removing biased filters helps reduce disparities in hiring outcomes across race, gender, age, and socioeconomic status.
Fill roles faster – With a more inclusive process and a larger talent pool, time-to-fill often improves.
According to McKinsey, companies that adopt skills-based models report better talent outcomes, such as going from getting only one overqualified candidate per listing to getting several appropriately qualified candidates to choose from.
Challenges to watch for
While the benefits are clear, implementing skills-based hiring takes intention. Some common challenges include:
Choosing the right assessments – Not all tests are job-relevant or fair across populations.
Ensuring consistency – If one hiring manager falls back on resumes while another uses skills data, it undermines equity.
Avoiding “proxies” for pedigree – Even with skills-based intent, hiring tools may still favor candidates from certain schools or companies unless safeguards are in place.